|| News ||
07/09/2005
Where will they live?
After years of building thriving communities in cities across
the country, now gay and lesbian seniors can’t afford to live
in them
By Jeremy Quittner
San Francisco has long been a mecca
for gay men and lesbians. That certainly has been the case
for Stephen Kellogg, 84, and his lifelong partner, Malcolm
McCay, 77, who moved to the city 30 years ago. They were both
early activists for gay liberation-Kellogg served as president
of the city’s Mattachine Society. And the couple held dances
in their home, where gay men could gather freely as an alternative
to the city’s Mafia-run gay nightclubs in the 1960s.
But by 1987 things had changed drastically
for Kellogg and McCay. The stock market crashed in October,
robbing them of valuable investment income they thought would
support them in their declining years, and the cost of living
in San Francisco skyrocketed. “It was getting very expensive,
and a lot of changes had taken place,” Kellogg says. “We decided
the money would go further somewhere else.” So they moved
to Oregon, where they say things for them went from bad to
worse as they grew increasingly isolated and ill.
The plight of Kellogg and McCay underscores
one of the most troubling predicaments facing elderly gay
men and lesbians today. After a lifetime building communities
in cities such as San Francisco, where it is estimated 20%
of the city’s senior citizens are gay or lesbian, they find
they can no longer afford to live there. So they move to more
affordable towns, where they are often strangers and lack
the community resources necessary to care for themselves.
Now, a San Francisco housing group
hopes to change things for the city’s gay and lesbian seniors.
Rainbow Adult Community Housing, a nonprofit organization,
is seeking to build the first mixed-income housing unit for
gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered seniors. And in
what is believed to be a first-of-its-kind grant, the group
recently received $250,000 from state government sources to
perform feasibility studies on the project.
When completed, the $50 million facility is expected to contain
about 250 units for about 330 people. It will include a mixture
of market-rate and subsidized apartments aimed and lower-
and middle-income seniors. And in addition to apartments,
the facility will feature a theater, café, fitness
center, and a dementia and Alzheimer’s disease care unit.
“We want to say to our elders that
we want you to continue to be a part of the community you
helped create,” says Jim Mitulski, RACH’s executive director.
“We really want to show everyone that their retirement years
can be as rich and rewarding and as community-filled as any
other times in their lives.”
Advocates for gay and lesbian seniors say economic circumstances
often force the elderly up against a wall, particularly in
the last years of their lives. Unwilling to move into traditional
assisted-care units or nursing homes, where they fear staff
may not be sympathetic to them and their partners, they suffer
in silence or alone. “People are not aware of a real aging
crisis in our community, due to the fact that the old are
so invisible,” says Terry Kaelber, executive director of Senior
Action in a Gay Environment, a New York-based social service
and advocacy group. “The vast majority of our seniors age
as single people, and if you do not have children or a spouse
to advocate for you, you are almost ignored.”
As it turns out, Kellogg and McCay
did find the cost of living less expensive in Oregon, but
they also found a raft of new acquaintances and neighbors
who they say disapproved of their sexuality and snubbed them.
Their situation deteriorated when McCay suffered a heart attack
and three strokes. McCay’s doctors sometimes treated Kellogg
like he didn’t exist, he says, and the couple depleted their
savings even further on medical treatments. After a nearly
10-year odyssey, shuffling McCay through various private and
state hospitals and nursing homes, they ended up back in San
Francisco again, practically destitute. Today, Kellogg rents
a room in a friend’s apartment, and McCay lives in a public
hospice for the chronically ill.
Realizing that the situation for gay seniors such as Kellogg
and McCay is critical-and sensing a market opportunity-private
developers have tried for years to build for-profit facilities
for higher-income gay and lesbian seniors. While there are
currently plans for about a dozen such facilities, only one
actually exists to date. Called the Palms of Manasota, Fla.,
it houses 30 people and was built with the developer’s own
funds. It is primarily a retirement community for middle-
and upper-income gays and lesbians who do not need assisted
living, though plans for an assisted-living unit are in the
works.
Part of the problem, developers say,
is that they are trapped in a paradox: Investors don’t want
to put up money for a larger project until they have seen
a successful model. Yet such a thing can’t be built without
adequate investor money. “Most of the [investor] money is
in the straight community, and the concern is that this has
not been done before,” says John DeLeo, managing partner of
the Shaman Development Group, based in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
His company has been trying to build for-profit housing for
gay and lesbian seniors since the late 1990s.
Where others have had difficulties,
RACH thinks its chances of success are excellent, partly because
of its mixed-income approach. It has already located a tract
of land in San Francisco’s Hayes Valley section, and it plans
to develop the land using a combination of corporate tax credits,
bonds, and hopefully, more government resources. “It will
not be as controversial here to use public funds for a gay-
and lesbian specific-project,” Mitulski says. “And if we can
do it here, it will help everyone turn a corner.”
For people like Kellogg and McCay,
that corner can’t be turned fast enough. “If [senior housing
for gays and lesbians] had existed, Malcolm and I would have
moved in when we retired,” Kellogg says. “We would never have
left San Francisco.” Quittner also writes for Business Week.
|